Talk:Naval Lord

I envision this to be more then just a "Founding member" of the squadron. I see them more as those who are dedicated to the advancement of the squadron as a whole and have the best of intentions of the squadron in mind. Much like an executive counsel that would give guidance and direction to the Board of Flags (BoF) should they need it but lets the BoF run the day to day of the squadron. That being said they may hold positions on the BoF as needed and are encouraged to do so. They are also subject to the promotion and award system. Just because they hold the special title doesn't mean we shouldn't recognize and award their efforts to the squadron.

Should the Naval Lords determine that one of their own is negligent, destructive, treasonous, and or absent in their duties and responsibilities to the Squadron they shall conduct an internal vote 2/3rds to retire the Naval Lord from office or remove them from office depending on the transgression.

Also there should always be at least three Naval Lord active in The Squadron. Should the original Naval Lords retire reducing their number below this limit there needs to be a way to pass on the torch to other member. A person should be selected based on the merits of their actions seen on a consistent basis in the squadron. A selectee should pass a BoF vote with a 3/4ths majority before being voted into office by a squadron vote with a 3/4ths majority. For these votes the abstaining members should not exceed 30%.

--Ashleigh bagster (talk) 15:50, 3 February 2016 (UTC)